Economic Impact of Sportfishing

As anglers, I doubt we even realize the impact wefishing trips and equipment. Fishing equipment
have on our nations economy. Hopefully this will giveexpenditures among African-American anglers
you some insight on the positive cash flow we createincreased 43 percent between 1991 and 1996.
by just doing what we are so passionate about.African-American anglers spend on average $324 per
In the past I've designed a couple of websites foryear for trip-related fishing expenses and $128 per
tournament anglers and in the process I wanted toyear on fishing equipment for a total of $814 million.
collect data to present to potential supporters andAfrican-American anglers spend more days fishing (22
sponsors to make them aware of impact andvs. 18) and take more trips (18 vs. 14), on average, than
participation. I recently "re-discovered" that data andall anglers. 64 percent of African-American anglers live
thought you might find it interesting. So below is somein the South compared to 39 percent of all anglers. 43
of the numbers I collected from various sources thatpercent of female anglers live in the South. 16 percent
paint a pretty good picture of how fishing has evolvedof African-American anglers live in the Midwest. 26
in to a money making, national past time.percent of female anglers live in the Midwest. 43
Right now, the only ripple of interest to your anglingpercent of Hispanic anglers live in the South. 38
friend is the one made by the fish as it surfaces at thepercent of Hispanic anglers live in the West compared
end of the line. But all around, the money spent to buyto 20 percent of all anglers. The number of days
tackle, gas for the boat and film to record the one thatfished by African-American anglers increased 72
didn't get away, is having a tremendous, positivepercent between 1991 and 1996 compared to 22
impact on the economy. On average, an anglerpercent for all anglers. The number of days fished by
spends over $1,200 every year on the sport. Hidden,female anglers increased 15 percent between 1991 and
but none-the-less real, is a multiplying factor that1996. The number of days fished by Hispanic anglers
effectively triples what you spend as the initialremained constant between 1991 and 1996, but fishing
expenditure ripples through the economy. Take fortrip expenditures increased 50 percent during the
example the $10 plunked down by an angler for a newsame period. 1.9 million persons 16 and older with
a lure. It spreads outward just like the ripples madedisabilities took 33 million fishing trips in 2001, fishing for
after the lure hits the water. That revenue helps the41 million days.
store's owner pay her rent, bills and employees. TheseWhy People Fish:
individuals then use part of that money for other goods33 percent of anglers fish to relax. 25 percent of
and services and the rippling effect further spreadsanglers fish as a way of spending time with family and
and repeats. Of course, ten dollars isn't very significantfriends. 65 percent of non-anglers and 88 percent of
by itself, but when 44 million anglers spend $41.5 billionanglers say that being asked by a child would make
in a year, the result in jobs, wages, and other economicthem want to go fishing or make them want to fish
effects is an extraordinary pillar of America'smore often.
economic health. More focused on playing the fish atWhat People Fish For and Where They Fish:
the end of the line, your typical angler gives littleBass fishing is the most popular type of fishing in the
thought to how his hobby is helping provide his fellowUnited States. 38 percent of all freshwater anglers in
Americans a boatload of benefits. The 1.1 million jobs,the United States fish for black bass. 28 percent of
$7.3 billion in tax revenues, and $30 billion in wagesfreshwater anglers fish for trout. 28 percent of
generated by recreational fishing are many timesfreshwater anglers fish for panfish. 27 percent of
greater than those created by corporate giants likefreshwater anglers fish for catfish. Bass are sought on
Ford, Microsoft or Nike. Generating more than $11636 percent of all freshwater fishing days. 92 percent
billion in total output, this remarkably simple activity ofof freshwater anglers fish in their state of residence.
dipping one's line in the water provides nine times the23 percent of freshwater anglers fish out of state. 85
economic benefit of commercial fishing. 'percent of freshwater anglers fish in flat water,
"I like to fish because it is totally relaxing. I love theincluding ponds, lakes and reservoirs. 44 percent of
water. I can concentrate and forget all my worries. Ifreshwater anglers fish rivers and streams.
count my blessings while fishing.' George Bush,U.S. Anglers by Age Group:
president."17 percent of 16-to 17-year-olds fish, comprising 4
Participation:percent of all anglers. 13 percent of 18-to 24-year-olds
44.4 million Americans ages 7 and older fish2 (Anfish, comprising 9 percent of all anglers. 19 percent of
estimated 50 million fish including all age groups). One25-to 34-year-olds fish, comprising 19 percent of all
out of every six U.S. residents 16 and older fish. 1 25anglers. 21 percent of 35-to 44-year-olds fish,
percent of U.S. males fish, and 8 percent of U.S.comprising 27 percent of all anglers. 17 percent of
females fish. 1 Excluding those who fished the Great45-to 54-year-olds fish, comprising 20 percent of all
Lakes, freshwater anglers account for 82 percent ofanglers. 16 percent of 55-to 64-year-olds fish,
all anglers. Anglers spend an average of 16 dayscomprising 12 percent of all anglers. 8 percent of 65+
fishing and take an average of 13 fishing trips annually.year-olds fish, comprising 9 percent of all anglers.
Anglers 16 and older took 365 million freshwater fishingFishing among 35- to 44-year-olds increased 60
trips in 2001 totaling 467 million days. Including saltwaterpercent between 1980 and 1995. It was the largest
anglers, 437 million fishing trips totaling 557 million daysincrease of any group.
were taken. From 1991 to 1996, freshwater fishingEconomic Impact of Fishing:
days rose 13 percent. The average number ofAnglers spent $35.6 billion in 2001 to pursue their sport.
freshwater fishing days per angler increased from 14.3They spent $14.7 billion for fishing trips, $17 billion for
in 1991 to 16.7 in 1996. Between 1980 and 1995, theequipment, and $4 billion for licenses, stamps tags, land
number of Americans who fished increased 16leasing and ownership, membership dues and
percent. Residents of the South provided the biggestcontributions, and magazines. 1 If hypothetically ranked
increase in fishing (21 percent) in the United Statesas a corporation, this revenue figure would put sport
between 1980 and 1995. The number of males fishingfishing at 32nd on the 2002 Fortune 500 list of
increased 14 percent from 1980 to 1995.America's largest companies. Total economic output
Popularity:generated by freshwater fishing in 2001 exceeded
Fishing ranks as the 4th most popular participation$74 billion, including the impact on retailers, suppliers of
sport in the nation. It ranks ahead of bicycling, bowling,goods and services to retailers, wholesalers and
basketball, golf, jogging, baseball, softball, soccer,manufacturers, plus the indirect and induced impacts
volleyball, tennis, football and skiing. Only walking,resulting from these activities. Including saltwater fishing,
swimming and camping are more popular. Moreeconomic output reached $116 billion. The average
Americans fish than play golf and tennis combined.angler incurs $1,046 in fishing-related expenses.
More Americans fish than play soccer and basketball.Freshwater fishing expenditures in 2001 generated
The number of youths ages 12 to 17 who participate inmore than $19.4 billion in wages. Including saltwater
freshwater fishing increased 10.9 percent since 1991 tofishing, $30.1 billion in wages were generated (up 23
4.5 million. During the same period, the number ofpercent since 1991). 683,892 full-time jobs exist due to
youths ages 12 to 17 who play baseball decreasedfreshwater fishing. Including saltwater fishing, the total
15.4 percent to 4 million. Basketball, softball, tennis andexceeds 1 million (up 16 percent since 1991). $2.07 billion
volleyball participation declined between 2 and 46was spent on fishing tackle in 2001. Fishing tackle ranks
percent. Fishing ranks as the 2nd most popular4th in terms of consumer expenditures for non-team
water-related outdoor sport in the United States.sports equipment. Golf equipment ranks first followed
Swimming ranks 1st. Freshwater fishing ranks as oneby exercise equipment and firearms for hunting. Florida
of the top-five participation sports in 7 states. Fishing inanglers spend more than $4 billion annually on fishing
general (both freshwater and saltwater) ranks as oneand related equipment. California and Texas anglers
of the top-five participation sports in 18 states. Fishing isspend more than $2 billion. Angler expenditures
the No. 1 participation sport in Minnesota, Florida, Newexceed $1 billion in Michigan, Minnesota, New York,
Jersey and North Carolina.North Carolina and Wisconsin.
Women and Minorities:Economic Impact of Fishing:
11.9 million women 7 and older fish. That's more thanU.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
the number who participate in jogging, basketball,Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of
volleyball, softball, golf or tennis. Freshwater fishing isthe Census. 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting
the 10th most popular participation sport amongand Wildlife-associated Recreation. National Sporting
women. 2 26.8 percent of all anglers are female 2Goods Association. Sports Participation in 2001. Future
(representing 8 percent of the U.S. female population).of Fishing project conducted by Responsive
5 percent of all anglers are black (representing 7Management of Harrisonburg, Va. American
percent of the black population). 5 percent of allSportfishing Association. The 2001 Demographics and
anglers are Hispanic (representing 7 percent of theEconomic Impact of Sport Fishing in the United States.
Hispanic population). The number of women fishingParticipation and Expenditure Patterns of
increased 19 percent from 1980 to 1995 compared toAfrican-American, Hispanic, and Women Hunters and
14 percent for males. The region that experienced theAnglers. Addendum to the 1996 National Survey of
largest increase in the number of females fishing wasFishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
the Northeast. Women spend on average $246 perBlack Bass Fishing in the U.S. Addendum to the 1996
year for trip-related fishing expenses and $70 per yearNational Survey of Fishing, Hunting and
on fishing equipment for a total of $3 billion. HispanicsWildlife-Associated Recreation. 1980-1995 Participation
fish at lower rates than African-Americans andin Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Watching. National and
women, but they spend, on average, more money -Regional Demographic Trends. Sport Fish and Wildlife
$434 per angler for trips and $154 for equipment.Restoration Web site, restorewildlife.org.
Hispanics spent a total of $696 million per year on